论庄子自然美学观与孔子诗教文学观之差异
|
谭慧敏
|
长春理工大学文学院，吉林长春，130022
|
摘要：庄子与孔子是中国先秦思想史上极具代表性的思想家，思想学说深受时代环境影响，既折射出春秋战国之际的社会现实、士人心态与政治理想，也深刻塑造了后世的文学观念与审美传统。在梳理儒道思想生成背景的基础上，从时代语境、核心观念、审美取向及后世影响等方面展开比较，探讨以孔子诗教观为代表的儒家文学观与庄子为代表的崇尚自然的道家文艺美学观之间的差异，并揭示其所蕴含的文化意义。
关健词：庄子；孔子；自然美学观；诗教文学观；差异
|
On the Differences Between Zhuangzi’s Aesthetic View of Nature and Confucius’s Literary View of Poetry Education
|
Huimin Tan
School of Literature，Changchun University of Science and Technology，Changchun Jilin 130022，China
|
Abstract：Zhuangzi and Confucius are highly representative thinkers in the history of pre-Qin Chinese thought. Their philosophical doctrines were deeply influenced by the historical context of their times, reflecting the social realities, the mindset of the literati, and the political ideals of the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods, while also profoundly shaping the literary concepts and aesthetic traditions of subsequent generations. Building upon an examination of the historical context in which Confucian and Daoist thought emerged, this paper conducts a comparative analysis across the dimensions of historical context, core concepts, aesthetic orientations, and influence on subsequent generations. It explores the differences between the Confucian view of literature—represented by Confucius’s poetic education—and the Daoist aesthetic view of literature and art—represented by Zhuangzi’s reverence for nature—and reveals the cultural significance inherent in these differences.
Keywords : Zhuangzi；Confucius；natural aesthetic view；poetic education and literary view；difference
参考文献
[1] 杨伯峻.论语译注[M].北京:中华书局,2015.
[2] 蔡尚思 . 孔子思想体系 [M]. 上海 : 上海人民出版社,1982.
[3] 郭庆藩.庄子集释[M].北京:中华书局,2016.
[4] 陈鼓应.庄子今注今译[M].北京:中华书局,2009.
[5] 孙以楷.道家与中国哲学:先秦卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.
[6] 袁行霈 . 中国文学史 [M]. 北 京 : 高等教育出版社,2014.
[7] 郭保红.论庄子的文艺美学观[J].芒种,2012(12):123-124.
[8] 许晓华 . 论庄子崇尚自然的审美理想 [D]. 苏州大学,2007.
|
|
|
论文收录证明 / 文献检索报告
Document Retrieval Certificate / Proof of Publication Indexing
作者贡献声明 / 贡献确认书
Author Contribution Statement / Certificate of Authorship Contribution
同行评审报告 / 评审意见
Peer Review Report / Peer Review Comments
利益冲突
Conflict of Interest
作者声明不存在任何利益冲突。
The author declares no conflict of interest.
|
|
